Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.
Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A recent report on the issue sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.
“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”
Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.
“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”
“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”
Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.
“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”
In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”
An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.
Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.
“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”
A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”
He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”
“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”
The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.
A professional gambler and strategy analyst with over a decade of experience in casino games, specializing in roulette techniques and probability theory.
Denise Alvarez
Denise Alvarez
Denise Alvarez
Denise Alvarez