"I will be positioned in this office by 2027," Starmer declared, adding that if our conversation proceeded smoothly, he might welcome us into his official residence for a follow-up conversation in the coming year.
There is rarely ever downtime for leaders. In the hour before we sat down, Sir Keir had been speaking with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and attempting to decipher what on earth had occurred in Venezuela, where his big ally, US President Donald Trump, had recently launched a strike against and detained its leader, Nicolás Maduro.
Once our interview, which was far more extended than normal, had concluded, Maduro had been charged in New York.
As the year commences, Sir Keir appears to have had a degree of a reboot. Maybe even just a bit of relaxation with his family at Chequers, the prime minister's country retreat.
That certainly appeared to have put him in improved morale than at the sluggish end of 2025, a terrible political year for him.
But are he and his colleagues deluding themselves if they reckon his political fate are poised to get better?
The uncomfortable truth for the leader is that numerous of his party members believe he's ineffective at his job. A faction of them would sooner gamble and oust him in 2026.
However Sir Keir was dismissing such talk in the interview on Saturday morning.
Multiple times he insisted he'd be "judged at the poll", arguing no one would remove his term from him – despite the fact that the best chance of preventing Nigel Farage and Reform UK getting to No 10 might be for Labour to switch leader.
"We are in the battle of our generation and I plan to guide the party," he affirmed.
The challenge for the PM is that he will be judged long before then – in a mega set of elections in May across the UK. He attempted to argue, perhaps excessively, that they are concerning who runs councils, and who runs the devolved administrations in Holyrood or Cardiff – and not a verdict on Westminster.
Accurate – up to a point. But although he may not want to admit it, No 10 will be evaluated by those elections too.
This did not stop Sir Keir implying that there were no situation under which he would step down, should one of his MPs ran against him for the job, should those elections be catastrophic for Labour.
He tried to explain his low poll ratings by saying the voters was reasonably anxious for things to get better. He tried to persuade me, and the public, that 2026 would be different.
The economy would improve notwithstanding rising unemployment, he claimed, when plans the government enacted during their first choppy year began to bear fruit.
His core message is that this year the country will "reach a turning point".
The PM may have communicated with more energy than observed from him for a some time – less tense, perhaps, with a longer slot to talk.
However, in spite of facing pressure from various quarters for a more decisive approach, with much more political direction, more dynamism, more speed and more immediacy, his arguments were familiar ones.
When he finds himself in such significant political peril, does he need a change of tack?
No government, and especially not one that has been struggling in the polls for many months, gets everything its as desired.
The Prime Minister's challenges are not only because government is challenging, but because he and his team have made mistakes, even in the last few weeks.
The PM admitted that he regretted saying he was "delighted" to see the return of the Egyptian-British activist Alaa Abd El Fattah to the UK following an backlash when past remarks he'd made in the past – such as calls for Zionists and police to be killed – came to light.
Starmer blamed "the process" for not realising what the activist had said before – a more diplomatic way of saying not my fault.
And he is courting obvious political perils as the year progresses. His friendship with the US president acquires a new risk after Trump's strikes on Venezuela.
Having interviewed Sir Keir Starmer, a ex- human rights lawyer who opposed the war in Iraq, over many years, the idea he would be content with such action seems implausible.
He asserted he was a "career-long advocate of international law" but the public "just haven't got the full picture at the moment".
Opponents called for him to denounce it prior to we spoke. And the administration is likely to face further scrutiny to give an clear view in Parliament in the coming days.
There has also always been bubbling pressure in the Labour ranks to undo or remake some of the outcomes of Brexit.
Sir Keir denies he's pursuing that, but his new firmer plan to move closer with the single market – the giant economic European trading zone – will likely trigger protests that he is going back on his vow never to try to reverse the results that flowed from Brexit.
A decision to cosy up to more of the single market will satisfy a faction on his own side, but it is prime ammunition for Reform and the Conservatives to
A professional gambler and strategy analyst with over a decade of experience in casino games, specializing in roulette techniques and probability theory.
Denise Alvarez
Denise Alvarez
Denise Alvarez
Denise Alvarez
Denise Alvarez
Denise Alvarez